Richard Gasquet vs Botic Van De Zandschulp Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 31 Mar at 03:19 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
R. Gasquet vs B. Van De Zandschulp

FRA
0
Win
Played
0
Win

NED
0
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Gasquet 0 - 0 Zandschulp
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Gasquet | 0 |
| Zandschulp | 0 |
Last 0 H2H Matches:
No past h2h happened.
R. Gasquet vs B. V. D. Zandschulp H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 0% (0-0) | Career Total W/L | 0% (0-0) |
| 0 | Titles | 7 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
R. Gasquet vs B. V. D. Zandschulp Match Preview:
In analyzing the upcoming tennis match, we focus on performance metrics to determine the favored player. Over the past year, Zandschulp has achieved a win-loss record of 51.47% with 35 wins and 33 losses, while Gasquet stands at an even 50% with 25 wins and 25 losses. When considering the best surfaces, Zandschulp exhibits a 63% win rate on indoor hard courts, whereas Gasquet has excelled on grass with a 65% win rate.
Looking at their second serve performance over the last six months, Gasquet leads slightly by winning 46.21% of points compared to Zandschulp's 44.21%. Furthermore, in return games, Zandschulp has won 46.49% of points on opponents' second serves, edging out Gasquet who managed 45.5%. When it comes to first serve returns, Zandschulp again surpasses Gasquet with 27.37% compared to 21.25%, offering insight into who might be favored in head-to-head encounters.
Examining pressure situations, Zandschulp has saved 51.22% of breakpoints in recent form, slightly lagging behind Gasquet's 56.44%. In terms of breakpoint conversion, Zandschulp has a conversion rate of 28.37%, while Gasquet improves slightly with 29.03%. These statistics provide valuable tips for in-game betting, especially when either player faces or capitalizes on breakpoint opportunities.
Diving into direct head-to-head encounters, Zandschulp has won both previous matches against Gasquet, claiming five sets to Gasquet's two. The last encounter saw Zandschulp victorious in a Wimbledon match with a scoreline of 7-5, 2-6, 7-6(7), 6-1. The average match time between them is two hours and one minute, hinting at potentially lengthy contests.
Regarding opponent quality, Zandschulp has faced players with an average ranking of 137.24 over the past year, higher than Gasquet's 207.2, which might influence predictions since facing tougher opponents typically hones performance. In deciding sets, Gasquet edges ahead with a 50% win rate compared to Zandschulp's 48% over the past 12 months, an essential stat if the match stretches to this length.
Although both players have comparable skills in various aspects, Zandschulp holds a slight advantage given his recent head-to-head success and superior return game statistics. However, Gasquet's experience and consistency in break point situations cannot be overlooked. Considering all factors, the match is predicted to be competitive, but Zandschulp is likely to emerge victorious based on the available statistics.
Richard Gasquet vs Botic Van De Zandschulp Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
Recent Performance Stats
R. Gasquet Recent Matches Played
B. V. D. Zandschulp Recent Matches Played

R. Gasquet vs B. V. D. Zandschulp Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 61.85% (783/483) | YTD Win/Loss | 60.83% (382/246) |
| 59.37% (1888/1292) | Sets Win/Loss | 57.84% (874/637) |
| 53.29% (16339/14324) | Games Win/Loss | 52.97% (7595/6742) |
| 60.38% (256/168) | Hard Win/Loss | 57.81% (74/54) |
| 63.22% (251/146) | Clay Win/Loss | 61.59% (178/111) |
| 60.76% (192/124) | Indoor Hard W/L | 64.13% (118/66) |
| 65.12% (84/45) | Grass Win/Loss | 44.44% (12/15) |
| 0.37 | Aces Per Game | 0.45 |
| 5583 | Aces Total | 3139 |
| 0.17 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.33 |
| 2544 | Total Double Faults | 2297 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1:36:56 |
| 461.15 | Average Opponent Rank | 393.63 |
| 61% (48452/79346) | 1st Serve % | 62% (25788/41885) |
| 73% (35276/48452) | 1st Serve Win % | 72% (18493/25788) |
| 53% (16344/30923) | 2nd Serve Win % | 48% (7758/16100) |
| 41% (3041/7489) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 43% (1881/4385) |
| 38% (30616/80572) | Return Points Win % | 40% (17540/43322) |
| 61.08% (124/79) | Slam W/L | 58.93% (33/23) |
| 56.27% (157/122) | Masters W/L | 48.21% (27/29) |
| 62.16% (23/14) | Cups W/L | 60.00% (12/8) |
| 62.96% (357/210) | Main Tour W/L | 51.30% (79/75) |
| 16.67% (1/5) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 69.77% (120/52) | Challenger W/L | 63.33% (76/44) |
| 0% (0/0) | Futures W/L | 69.82% (155/67) |
| 63% (647/1034) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 62% (354/572) |
| 61% (133/219) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 49% (21/43) |
| 56% (280/503) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 53% (108/205) |
| 57% (202/356) | Deciding Set Win % | 57% (117/206) |
| 87% (747/653) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 89% (359/319) |
| 12% (747/92) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 11% (359/39) |
| 25% (519/130) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 23% (267/62) |